Skip to product information
1 of 1

The Centre for Management Practice

A Whistleblower’s Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) and (B)

A Whistleblower’s Dilemma in the House of Wirecard (A) and (B)

By: Abhijeet Vadera , Cheah Sin Mei , Mahima Rao-Kachroo
Discipline: Business and society

Description

The two-part case follows the story of Pav Gill, the whistleblower who helped uncover one of Europe’s largest corporate frauds at Wirecard, the German fintech that went bankrupt in 2020.

Founded in 1999, Wirecard grew from an inconspicuous company to a listed firm on the blue-chip DAX, Germany’s main stock index in 2018. Wirecard’s meteoric rise to fame was questioned by some but largely acclaimed by investors who knew little about its murky dealings beneath its successful façade.

Part (A) begins in 2018 with Gill joining Wirecard’s Singapore office as the Head of Legal for the Asia Pacific region. Within a few months, Gill discovered multiple instances of falsified accounts, forgery, back-dated invoices, round-tripping, and questionable hiring practices. Despite escalating the matter to the Munich headquarters, his efforts on speaking up for justice backfired. Even after he left Wirecard, he was stalked by strangers and sabotaged at job interviews. At that point, he had to decide if he should remain silent or expose the scandal, and if so, how.

Part (B) describes the frustration of Sokhbir Kaur, Gill’s mother, at Wirecard’s harassment and threats to her son’s life, before resorting to take matters into her own hands. She initiated contact with well-reputed journalists to expose the scandal—a move that stunned Gill. The Financial Times eventually interviewed them and published the story in January 2019, which spelt the beginning of the end for Wirecard.

The case teaches students to recognise the contextual factors when deciding upon an appropriate course of action when faced with value conflicts. They will identify and develop strategies to articulate and work on value conflicts in a way that leads to less negative consequences. In addition, they will assess whether the case protagonist could have managed the situation differently (if at all).

Inspection copies and teaching notes are available for university faculty. To receive an inspection copy and teaching note, please email cmpshop [at] smu.edu.sg with your registered faculty email ID and a link to your contact information on the faculty directory at your university as verification. An inspection copy and teaching note will then be sent to your faculty email account.

Download Information

SMU Faculty/Staff can download the case & teaching note on iNet with your SMU login ID & Password via the following links:

· The Case Part A (SMU-23-0013)

· The Case Part B (SMU-23-0013)

· Teaching Note (SMU-23-0013TN)

For purchase of the case and supplementary materials via The Case Centre, please access the following links:

· The Case Part A (SMU-23-0013)

· The Case Part B (SMU-23-0013)

· Teaching Note (SMU-23-0013)

For purchase of the case and supplementary materials via Harvard Business Publishing, please access the following links:

· The Case Part A (SMU-23-0013)

· The Case Part B (SMU-23-0013)

· Teaching Note (SMU-23-0013)

Industry

Fintech industry

Temporal Coverage

2018

Year Completed

2023

Education Level

Executive
Postgraduate
Undergraduate

Data Source

Field Research

Geographic Coverage

Singapore

Published Date

Price

Regular price S$6.00
Regular price Sale price S$6.00
Sale Sold out
Taxes included.

(Please note you are purchasing the case only.)

View full details